From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigor v. Carlsen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-cv-01388 KJM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01388 KJM AC PS

09-20-2021

SORAYA MARIE RIGOR, Plaintiff, v. DALE AND KATY CARLSEN, CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE AND ENTREPRENEUERSHIP, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).

On August 11, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, though she has filed a batch of e-mails, ECF 4, and also has filed an amended complaint, ECF No. 8, which was not authorized by the court.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 11, 2021, are adopted in full; and

2. All claims against all defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice and this case is closed.


Summaries of

Rigor v. Carlsen

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 20, 2021
2:21-cv-01388 KJM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)
Case details for

Rigor v. Carlsen

Case Details

Full title:SORAYA MARIE RIGOR, Plaintiff, v. DALE AND KATY CARLSEN, CENTER FOR…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 20, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01388 KJM AC PS (E.D. Cal. Sep. 20, 2021)