From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigney v. Hamilton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 7, 2024
4:23-cv-00939-BRW (E.D. Ark. Mar. 7, 2024)

Opinion

4:23-cv-00939-BRW

03-07-2024

REX RIGNEY #87151 PLAINTIFF v. DAVID HAMILTON, RN Pope County Detention Center DEFENDANT


ORDER

BILLY ROY WILSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

I have reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. (Doc. 14.) No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has passed.

Therefore, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 11) is granted, and Plaintiff's claim against Defendant Hamilton is dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rigney v. Hamilton

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Mar 7, 2024
4:23-cv-00939-BRW (E.D. Ark. Mar. 7, 2024)
Case details for

Rigney v. Hamilton

Case Details

Full title:REX RIGNEY #87151 PLAINTIFF v. DAVID HAMILTON, RN Pope County Detention…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Mar 7, 2024

Citations

4:23-cv-00939-BRW (E.D. Ark. Mar. 7, 2024)