From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riggs v. Filson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2023
3:21-cv-00071-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)

Opinion

3:21-cv-00071-ART-CSD

10-19-2023

DANIEL HARVEY RIGGS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN TIMOTHY FILSON, Respondents.


ORDER

ANNE R. TRAUM, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Petitioner moves for an extension of time to file his reply in support of his first amended petition. (ECF No. 57.) The Court finds the request is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and therefore good cause exists to grant the motion.

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's first unopposed motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 57) is granted. Petitioner has until March 11, 2024, to file his reply.

It is further ordered that Respondents' unopposed second motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 50) is granted nunc pro tunc.


Summaries of

Riggs v. Filson

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Oct 19, 2023
3:21-cv-00071-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Riggs v. Filson

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL HARVEY RIGGS, Petitioner, v. WARDEN TIMOTHY FILSON, Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Oct 19, 2023

Citations

3:21-cv-00071-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Oct. 19, 2023)