From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riggs v. AT&T

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 29, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02005-REB-NYW (D. Colo. Apr. 29, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 15-cv-02005-REB-NYW

04-29-2016

DEBRA L. RIGGS, Plaintiff, v. AT&T, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Blackburn, J.

The matter before me is the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#8], filed March 30, 2016. No objections having been filed to the recommendation, I review it only for plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service , 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005). Finding no such error in the magistrate judge's recommended disposition, I find and conclude that recommendation should be approved and adopted and that this case should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

"[#8]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. Morales-Fernandez , 418 F.3d at 1122. In addition, because plaintiff is proceeding pro se, I have construed her pleadings more liberally and held them to a less stringent standard than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Erickson v. Pardus , 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S. Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton , 483 F.3d 1070, 1076 (10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Bellmon , 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct. 594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972)). --------

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#8], filed March 30, 2016, is approved and adopted as an order of this court.

2. That plaintiff's claims against defendant are dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute; and

3. That this case is closed.

Dated April 29, 2016, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Riggs v. AT&T

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 29, 2016
Civil Action No. 15-cv-02005-REB-NYW (D. Colo. Apr. 29, 2016)
Case details for

Riggs v. AT&T

Case Details

Full title:DEBRA L. RIGGS, Plaintiff, v. AT&T, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 29, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 15-cv-02005-REB-NYW (D. Colo. Apr. 29, 2016)