Opinion
2022-1469
01-17-2023
RIGGS TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. VAGARO, INC., Defendant-Appellee
WILLIAM PETERSON RAMEY, III, Ramey LLP, Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appellant. SAL LIM, Kramer Day Alberti Lim Tonkovich &Belloli LLP, Burlingame, CA, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARC BELLOLI, HONG LIN.
This disposition is nonprecedential.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:21-cv-07927-TSH, Magistrate Judge Thomas S. Hixson.
WILLIAM PETERSON RAMEY, III, Ramey LLP, Houston, TX, for plaintiff-appellant.
SAL LIM, Kramer Day Alberti Lim Tonkovich &Belloli LLP, Burlingame, CA, for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MARC BELLOLI, HONG LIN.
Before TARANTO, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.
CHEN, CIRCUIT JUDGE
Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC appeals from a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California holding that all claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,299,067 ('067 patent) are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. See Riggs Tech. Holdings, LLC v. Vagaro, Inc., No. 21-cv-07927-TSH, 2022 WL 74179, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 7, 2022). Our decision today in a separate case, Riggs Technology Holdings, LLC v. Cengage Learning, Inc., No. 22-1468, affirmed a decision by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts that also held that all claims of the '067 patent are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101. Our decision in case No. 22-1468 has thus resolved the patent eligibility of the claims on appeal. See BTG Int'l Ltd. v. Amneal Pharms. LLC, 923 F.3d 1063, 1076-77 (Fed. Cir. 2019). We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot.
DISMISSED