From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigg v. Vernell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 23, 1982
428 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. 81-1283.

November 23, 1982.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Rhea Pincus Grossman, J.

Paige and Catlin and Steven H. Hibbe, Miami, for appellant.

Lapidus Stettin and Herbert Stettin, Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.


The final judgment denying specific performance to the purchaser under a land sale contract is affirmed. Any deficiencies in the trial, which were caused by the illness of plaintiff's counsel, were remedied by the trial court's order granting partial rehearing and reopening the cause for the taking of additional testimony on the critical issues presented. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.530(a). On the merits, the plaintiff relied upon an oral modification of the written land sale contract and cannot now take the inconsistent position that the written contract could not be changed by parol agreement. Hodkin v. Perry, 88 So.2d 139 (Fla. 1956); United Contractors, Inc. v. United Construction Corp., 187 So.2d 695, 701 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Rigg v. Vernell

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 23, 1982
428 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Rigg v. Vernell

Case Details

Full title:MATT RIGG, APPELLANT, v. LOUIS VERNELL, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 23, 1982

Citations

428 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Sanchez v. G.M.A.C

See Montero v. Compugraphic Corp., 531 So.2d 1034, 1036 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (stating that: "A litigant cannot,…

Montero v. Compugraphic Corp.

If, for failure of an acceptance, Montero's offer never became a binding contract, which Compugraphic…