From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rifkin v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Adel, JJ.


In an action to recover upon a life insurance policy. order denying plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings and granting defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment, and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, without costs. It is not disputed that the insured well knew at the time he received the amount of the loan that the annual premium due November 28, 1930, had been deducted. He was not, therefore, misled. ( del Rio v. Prudential Ins. Co., 269 N.Y. 135.) He further well knew, and was advised by defendant, that unless the annual premium due November 28, 1931, was paid, the policy would lapse and become forfeited. The premium was not paid and defendant is, therefore, entitled to summary judgment. ( Starker v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, 246 App. Div. 567.)


Summaries of

Rifkin v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Rifkin v. Manhattan Life Insurance Co. of New York

Case Details

Full title:ROSE RIFKIN, Appellant, v. THE MANHATTAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 732 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)