From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rieman v. Lavin

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco
Jun 2, 2003
CASE NO. C 02-3067 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2003)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 02-3067 CRB.

June 2, 2003.

Daniel T. Bernhard, Freeland Cooper Foreman LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs Peter Rieman and Deborah Rieman.

Stephen H. Dye, Schnader Harrison Segal Lewis LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendants James Lavin, Lavin Holdings, LLC and Gila Letter.

Brian E. Mass, Frankfurt Garbus Kurnit Klein Selz, New York, NY, Attorneys for Defendant James Lavin, Lavin Holdings, LLC. and Gila Leiter.


STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT AND COUNTERCLAIMS


IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their designated counsel that the entire action, including the Complaint filed by Plaintiffs PETER RIEMAN and DEBORAH RIEMAN on or about May 17, 2002, and the Counterclaims filed by Defendant JAMES LAVIN on or about September 20, 2002, in the above-captioned action, be and hereby are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1), provided that nothing in this Dismissal shall limit any claim or right arising from any provision contained in the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release and Stipulation For Entry Of Judgment, entered into by the Parties as a part of the settlement herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rieman v. Lavin

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco
Jun 2, 2003
CASE NO. C 02-3067 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2003)
Case details for

Rieman v. Lavin

Case Details

Full title:PETER RIEMAN and DEBORAH RIEMAN, Plaintiffs, v. JAMES LAVIN, LAVIN…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Francisco

Date published: Jun 2, 2003

Citations

CASE NO. C 02-3067 CRB (N.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2003)