From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 4, 1936
162 Misc. 247 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)

Opinion

December 4, 1936.

Appeal from the City Court of City of New York, County of Bronx.

Chauncey L. Grant [ Walter L. Glenney of counsel], for the appellant.

Joseph R. Damico [ Abraham L. Lazarus of counsel], for the respondents.



There was proof of the violation of an ordinance with respect to lighting, and under the circumstances defendant's negligence and plaintiff's contributory negligence were questions of fact. It was error, therefore, for the court to dismiss the complaint, and the order setting aside the dismissal was proper.

Order affirmed, with costs to respondents to abide the event.

Present — LYDON, LEVY and CALLAHAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Dec 4, 1936
162 Misc. 247 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
Case details for

Riehl v. West Farms-Tremont Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROSE RIEHL and Another, Respondents, v. WEST FARMS-TREMONT CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 1936

Citations

162 Misc. 247 (N.Y. App. Term 1936)
293 N.Y.S. 360