From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rieco v. Moran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 30, 2015
Civil Action No. 2: 14-cv-0588 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2: 14-cv-0588

03-30-2015

DWAYNE L. RIECO, Plaintiff, v. C/O MORAN, et al., Defendants.


United States District Judge Arthur J. Schwab

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

I. Recommendation

For the reasons that follow, it is respectfully recommended that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction / Temporary Restraining Order by Plaintiff, Dwayne L. Rieco (ECF No. 43) be denied.

II. Report

On October 29, 2014, Defendants filed a partial Motion to Dismiss, with accompanying brief. Plaintiff was ordered to respond no later than January 5, 2015. On November 26, 2014, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time in which to respond to the motion. Said request was granted and Plaintiff was granted an extension to January 30, 2015 to respond to the partial motion to dismiss.

On December 5, 2014, Plaintiff filed the instant Motion for Preliminary Injunction / Temporary Restraining Order. (ECF No. 43). Distilled to its essence, the motion simply recounts certain events that occurred in order to explain why Plaintiff would not be able to timely respond to Defendants' motion to dismiss. However, on January 30, 2015, Plaintiff did in fact timely file his Brief in opposition to the Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 58). Therefore, any claim of injury, much less "immediate and irreparable injury," is moot.

III. Conclusion

For the reasons stated above, it is respectfully recommended that the Motion for Preliminary Injunction / Temporary Restraining Order filed by Plaintiff (ECF No. 43) be denied.

In accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72(D)(2) of the Local Rules for Magistrates Judges, the parties are allowed fourteen (14) days after service of this Report and Recommendation, to file Objections to this Report And Recommendation. Any party opposing the objections shall have fourteen (14) days after date of service to respond to the objections. Failure to file Objections will waive the right to appeal. Brightwell v. Lehman, 637 F.3d 187, 193 n.7 (3d Cir. 2011). Dated: March 30, 2015

s/ Cynthia Reed Eddy

Cynthia Reed Eddy

United States Magistrate Judge
cc: DWAYNE L. RIECO

HU-2494

SCI Pittsburgh

Post Office Box 99991

Pittsburgh, PA 15233

(via U.S. First Class Mail)

Yana L. Warshafsky

Office of the Attorney General

(via ECF electronic notification)


Summaries of

Rieco v. Moran

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 30, 2015
Civil Action No. 2: 14-cv-0588 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2015)
Case details for

Rieco v. Moran

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE L. RIECO, Plaintiff, v. C/O MORAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 30, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 2: 14-cv-0588 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 30, 2015)