From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rieco v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 10, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00351 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2015)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00351

06-10-2015

DWAYNE RIECO, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN COLEMAN, et al., Defendants.

cc: DWAYNE RIECO HU2494 PO Box 99991 Pittsburgh, PA 15233 (via U.S. First Class Mail) Mary Lynch Friedline Office of Attorney General (via ECF electronic notification) Yana L. Warshafsky Office of the Attorney General (via ECF electronic notification) Cassidy L. Neal Mats Baum O'Connor P.C. (via ECF electronic notification)


MEMORANDUM ORDER

This case was commenced on March 18, 2014, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges.

Defendant Dr. Saavedra and the DOC Defendants filed separate Motions to Dismiss, both of which were converted into Motions for Summary Judgment on the issue of exhaustion (ECF Nos. 39 and 41, respectively).

On May 7, 2015, Magistrate Judge Eddy filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 64) recommending that the motions to dismiss which had been converted into motions for summary judgment be granted. The Report and Recommendation was mailed to Plaintiff at his listed address of record. Plaintiff was advised that written objections to the Report and Recommendation were to be filed by May 26, 2015. On May 18, 2015, Plaintiff requested an extension of time to file his written objections. Said request was granted and Plaintiff was given until June 5, 2015 to file written objections.

The time has now passed for filing written objections. Plaintiff has not filed any objections nor has he requested additional time in which to do so.

The Court has reviewed the matter and concludes that the Report and Recommendation correctly analyzes the issues and makes a sound recommendation. Accordingly, after de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 10 day of June, 2015:

1. The Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Dr. Saavedra (ECF No. 39) and the Motion to Dismiss filed by the DOC Defendants (ECF No. 41), both of which have been converted into a Motion for Summary Judgment on the issue of exhaustion, are GRANTED; and

2. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 64) dated May 7, 2015, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

So ORDERED this 10 day of June, 2015.

/s/_________

Arthur J. Schwab

United States District Judge
cc: DWAYNE RIECO

HU2494

PO Box 99991

Pittsburgh, PA 15233

(via U.S. First Class Mail)

Mary Lynch Friedline

Office of Attorney General

(via ECF electronic notification)

Yana L. Warshafsky

Office of the Attorney General

(via ECF electronic notification)

Cassidy L. Neal

Mats Baum O'Connor P.C.

(via ECF electronic notification)


Summaries of

Rieco v. Coleman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 10, 2015
Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00351 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Rieco v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:DWAYNE RIECO, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN COLEMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 10, 2015

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:14-cv-00351 (W.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2015)