From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridolfi v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 2008
49 A.D.3d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 2999.

March 6, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shirley Werner Kornreich, J.), entered June 8, 2007, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for appellant.

Mischel Horn, P.C., New York (Scott T. Horn of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ. [ See 2007 NY Slip Op 31539(U).]


The record evidence establishes that summary judgment was properly granted in this action where plaintiff was injured when she slipped on the bottom step of defendants' exterior staircase during a rainstorm, and fell forward. The subject staircase was equipped with handrails on both sides and plaintiff testified that despite the wet conditions, she did not hold onto the handrail as she descended the stairs, which, according to both parties' experts, had a coefficient of friction above the standard. Regardless of the existence of any alleged building code violation in the configuration of the handrails, such was not a proximate cause of plaintiff's fall, and to find that the presence of an alternative handrail configuration would have prevented the fall would be based on speculation ( see Plowden v Stevens Partners, LLC, 45 AD3d 659; see also Jenkins v New York City Hous. Auth., 11 AD3d 358, 359-360).


Summaries of

Ridolfi v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 6, 2008
49 A.D.3d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Ridolfi v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:JANE RIDOLFI, Appellant, v. ANNEWILLIAMS et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 6, 2008

Citations

49 A.D.3d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 2000
853 N.Y.S.2d 56

Citing Cases

Uppstrom v. Peter Dillon's Pub

It is undisputed, indeed all of the experts agree, that the stairs were only required to have one railing and…

Seleman v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.

In response to these allegations, defendant made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a…