From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridley v. Ridley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

2383N.

December 4, 2003.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jacqueline Silbermann, J.), entered June 13, 2003, which denied defendant's motion to vacate a default judgment for divorce, directing equitable distribution of the marital estate, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Helene Brezinsky, Plaintiff-Respondent.

Philip C. Segal, Defendant-Appellant.

Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Williams, JJ.


Defendant failed to make the requisite showing of a reasonable excuse for her default and a meritorious defense ( Estate of Allen v. Allen, 258 A.D.2d 423). The unsworn letter submitted from a clinic where defendant sought treatment several months after her default was not in admissible form, and failed to establish that the default was based on illness. Even if the letter were admissible and established an excuse for the default, defendant has still failed to establish a meritorious defense.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Ridley v. Ridley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 4, 2003
2 A.D.3d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Ridley v. Ridley

Case Details

Full title:JOHN SAMUEL RIDLEY, JR., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. BETTINA KIRK RIDLEY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 4, 2003

Citations

2 A.D.3d 159 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
767 N.Y.S.2d 622