From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridgell-Boltz v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00252-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00252-RPM

01-10-2012

LAURA RIDGELL-BOLTZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, United States Social Security Administration, and THE U.S. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendants.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER VACATING TRIAL

After review of the Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions or, in the Alternative, to Continue Trial Date, filed January 9, 2012, and the defendants' response, also filed January 9, 2012, the Court finds and concludes that because the impact of the failure of the defendants to comply with the discovery obligation to produce documents is unclear and the content of the previously undisclosed documents may affect the merits of the plaintiff's claims, it is

ORDERED that the trial set to begin on January 17, 2012, is vacated and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion for sanctions is deferred and will be considered after counsel have had a reasonable opportunity to review the previously undisclosed documents.

BY THE COURT:

__________________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

Ridgell-Boltz v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jan 10, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-cv-00252-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Ridgell-Boltz v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LAURA RIDGELL-BOLTZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, United…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jan 10, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-cv-00252-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 10, 2012)