From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridge v. Multnomah County Assessor

Tax Court of Oregon
Aug 14, 2012
TC-MD 111133D (Or. T.C. Aug. 14, 2012)

Opinion

TC-MD 111133D

08-14-2012

JEAN RIDGE, Plaintiff v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant, and DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor.


DECISION OF DISMISSAL

JILL A. TANNER PRESIDING MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter is before the court on its own motion to dismiss this case for lack of prosecution.

A case management conference was scheduled at 3:00 p.m. on July 30, 2012, to consider Plaintiff's appeal. On July 11, 2012, the court sent notice of the scheduled case management conference to Plaintiff via email, using the email address Plaintiff provided to the court. The notice was not returned as undeliverable. The notice advised that if Plaintiff did not appear, the court might dismiss the appeal.

On July 30, 2012, the court sent Plaintiff a letter which explained the importance of diligently pursuing an appeal. That letter was not returned as undeliverable. The letter advised that if Plaintiff did not provide a written explanation by August 13, 2012, for her failure to appear, the court would dismiss the appeal. As of this date, Plaintiff has not submitted a written response to the court explaining her failure to appear at the July 30, 2012, case management conference. Under such circumstances, the court finds the appeal must be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that the Complaint is dismissed.


Summaries of

Ridge v. Multnomah County Assessor

Tax Court of Oregon
Aug 14, 2012
TC-MD 111133D (Or. T.C. Aug. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Ridge v. Multnomah County Assessor

Case Details

Full title:JEAN RIDGE, Plaintiff v. MULTNOMAH COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant, and…

Court:Tax Court of Oregon

Date published: Aug 14, 2012

Citations

TC-MD 111133D (Or. T.C. Aug. 14, 2012)