From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rider v. Uphold HQ Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 31, 2022
22-cv-1602 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)

Opinion

22-cv-1602 (VSB)

03-31-2022

THEODORE RIDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UPHOLD HQ INC., et al., Defendants.


ORDER

VERNON S. BRODERICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiffs Theodore Rider, Gilles Boevi, and Jesse W. Smith filed this action against Defendants Uphold HQ Inc. (“Uphold HQ”) and John Does 1-10 on February 25, 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiffs filed an affidavit of service on March 11, 2022. (Doc. 5.) The deadline for Defendant Uphold HQ to respond to Plaintiffs' complaint was March 30, 2022. (See Doc. 5.) To date, Defendant has not appeared or responded to the complaint. Plaintiffs, however, have taken no action to prosecute this case. Accordingly, if Plaintiffs intend to seek a default judgment, they are directed to do so in accordance with Rule 4(H) of my Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases by no later than April 7, 2022. If Plaintiffs fail to do so or otherwise demonstrate that they intend to prosecute this litigation, I may dismiss this case for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rider v. Uphold HQ Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 31, 2022
22-cv-1602 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)
Case details for

Rider v. Uphold HQ Inc.

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE RIDER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UPHOLD HQ INC., et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 31, 2022

Citations

22-cv-1602 (VSB) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2022)