From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridenour v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 25, 1998
707 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Case No. 97-01427.

Opinion filed March 25, 1998.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Raymond O. Gross, Judge.

Patrick D. Doherty of Patrick D. Doherty, P.A., Clearwater, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Scott A. Browne, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Cable Ridenour challenges his convictions for aggravated battery on the ground that the prosecutor made allegedly improper comments during closing argument. Defense counsel did not object to any of the State's remarks. In his argument on appeal, Ridenour also charges that his counsel was ineffective, based on this failure to object. We hold that the prosecutor's statements did not rise to the level of fundamental error, and affirm Ridenour's conviction. Our affirmance is without prejudice to his filing a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 to assert his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Affirmed.

PATTERSON, A.C.J., and GREEN, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Ridenour v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 25, 1998
707 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Ridenour v. State

Case Details

Full title:CABLE J. RIDENOUR, III, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 25, 1998

Citations

707 So. 2d 1183 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Ridenour v. State

On direct appeal, this court affirmed. See Ridenour v. State, 707 So.2d 1183 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998).…