From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riddle v. Napel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2016
Case No. 2:13-CV-152 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 2:13-CV-152

08-24-2016

MARCEL RIDDLE, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT NAPEL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Timothy Greeley's June 29, 2016 Report and Recommendation, which recommends that the Court grant Defendant Napel's motion for summary judgment and dismiss Plaintiff's complaint in its entirety. The Report and Recommendation was served on Plaintiff on June 29, 2016. On July 25, 2016, this Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file objections, granting Plaintiff until August 15, 2016 to file objections. The deadline has passed and Plaintiff has failed to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Accordingly, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 102), filed June 29, 2016, is approved and adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 100) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

This case is concluded. Dated: August 24, 2016

/s/ Gordon J. Quist

GORDON J. QUIST

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Riddle v. Napel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION
Aug 24, 2016
Case No. 2:13-CV-152 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2016)
Case details for

Riddle v. Napel

Case Details

Full title:MARCEL RIDDLE, Plaintiff, v. ROBERT NAPEL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 24, 2016

Citations

Case No. 2:13-CV-152 (W.D. Mich. Aug. 24, 2016)