From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridder v. Gerard

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1917
221 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1917)

Opinion

Argued October 9, 1917

Decided October 23, 1917

John M. Bowers and Latham G. Reed for appellants.

Frederick H. Sanborn for respondent.


Order affirmed, with costs, and questions certified answered as follows: Second question in the negative so far as concerns the cause of action to recover damages on account of stock purchased in open market, and in affirmative so far as concerns cause of action based on subscription agreement; third question in the affirmative; first question not answered; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, CUDDEBACK, POUND, McLAUGHLIN and ANDREWS, JJ. Not voting: HOGAN, J.


Summaries of

Ridder v. Gerard

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Oct 23, 1917
221 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1917)
Case details for

Ridder v. Gerard

Case Details

Full title:STANISLAUS DE RIDDER, as Administrator of the Estate of GUILLAUME REUSENS…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Oct 23, 1917

Citations

221 N.Y. 665 (N.Y. 1917)
117 N.E. 1065

Citing Cases

State v. Bronxville Glen I Associates

The appropriate inquiry is whether or not liability would exist under New York law but for the enactment of…

State v. Bronxville Glen I Associates

The appropriate inquiry is whether or not liability would exist under New York law but for the enactment of…