From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rico-Torres v. Cameron

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2023
2:22-cv-01869-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01869-APG-BNW

04-04-2023

JAVIER RICO-TORRES, Plaintiff v. DARCY CAMERON, et al., Defendants


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE

[ECF NO. 14]

ANDREW P. GORDON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

On March 15, 2023, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that this case be dismissed based on the plaintiff's representation that he attempted to file a motion to dismiss this action. ECF No. 14. Plaintiff Javier Rico-Torres did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Weksler's report and recommendation (ECF No. 14) is accepted. Plaintiff Javier Rico-Torres's complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.


Summaries of

Rico-Torres v. Cameron

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 4, 2023
2:22-cv-01869-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)
Case details for

Rico-Torres v. Cameron

Case Details

Full title:JAVIER RICO-TORRES, Plaintiff v. DARCY CAMERON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 4, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-01869-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 4, 2023)