From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Justice v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16cv94 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2018)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16cv94

03-23-2018

RICKY BERNARD JUSTICE v. WARDEN HARRIS, ET AL.


ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Ricky Bernard Justice, an inmate at the Polunsky Unit, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge entered a Report (docket entry no. 72) recommending that plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (Docket Entry No. 49) should be denied.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. It is therefore

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order is DENIED.

So ORDERED and SIGNED this 23 day of March, 2018.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Justice v. Harris

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 23, 2018
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16cv94 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2018)
Case details for

Justice v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:RICKY BERNARD JUSTICE v. WARDEN HARRIS, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 23, 2018

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:16cv94 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 23, 2018)