From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ricks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 13, 2000
767 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

Case No. 3D00-1001

Opinion filed September 13, 2000. July Term, A.D. 2000

An Appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(i) from the Circuit Court of Miami-Dade County, Barbara S. Levenson, Judge. L.T. NO. 96-18004

Roy Milton Ricks, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before JORGENSON, COPE, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


CONFESSION OF ERROR


The trial court order denying the Motion for Post-Conviction Relief filed by the appellant Roy Milton Ricks is reversed based on the Confession of Error filed by the appellee State of Florida. Because the offense for which Ricks was convicted occurred within the applicable window period for standing to challenge the constitutionality of enhanced sentences under the Gort Act, Ch. 95-182, Laws of Fla., the enhanced sentence entered under that Act in Ricks' case was properly challenged in his rule 3.850 motion. The case is therefore remanded to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with the valid laws in effect on June 8, 1996, the date of Ricks' offense. See Salters v. State, 758 So.2d 667 (Fla. 2000); Hayes v. State, 598 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992).

Reversed and remanded for resentencing.


Summaries of

Ricks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Sep 13, 2000
767 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ricks v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROY MILTON RICKS, Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Sep 13, 2000

Citations

767 So. 2d 610 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)