From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rickrode v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 22, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-976 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-976

09-22-2017

DEBORAH LYNNE RICKRODE, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant


( ) ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2017, upon consideration of the report (Doc. 10) of Magistrate Judge Karoline Mehalchick, recommending the court deny the appeal (Doc. 1) of Deborah Lynne Rickrode ("Rickrode") from the decision of the administrative law judge denying Rickrode's application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits, and the court noting that Rickrode filed objections (Doc. 11) to the report, and the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") filed a response (Doc. 12) thereto, and following a de novo review of the contested portion of the report, see Behar v. Pa. Dep't of Transp., 791 F. Supp. 2d 383, 389 (M.D. Pa. 2011) (citing Sample v. Diecks, 885 F.2d 1099, 1106 n.3 (3d Cir. 1989); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C)), and applying a clear error standard of review to the uncontested portions, see Cruz v. Chater, 990 F. Supp. 375, 376-78 (M.D. Pa. 1999), the court being in agreement with Judge Mehalchick that the decision of the administrative law judge is "supported by substantial evidence," 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Fargnoli v. Massanari, 247 F.3d 34, 38 (3d Cir. 2001), and finding Judge Mehalchick's analysis to be thorough, well-reasoned, and fully supported by the record, and further finding Rickrode's objections to be without merit and squarely addressed by the report, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The report (Doc. 10) of Magistrate Judge Mehalchick is ADOPTED.

2. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security ("Commissioner") denying the application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits of Deborah Lynne Rickrode ("Rickrode") is AFFIRMED.

3. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment in favor of the Commissioner and against Rickrode as set forth in paragraph 2.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

/S/ CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

Christopher C. Conner, Chief Judge

United States District Court

Middle District of Pennsylvania


Summaries of

Rickrode v. Berryhill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 22, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-976 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2017)
Case details for

Rickrode v. Berryhill

Case Details

Full title:DEBORAH LYNNE RICKRODE, Plaintiff v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-976 (M.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2017)