From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rickman v. Butler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION
Jul 20, 2014
Case No. 6:13-cv-00088-SLB-HGD (N.D. Ala. Jul. 20, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 6:13-cv-00088-SLB-HGD

07-20-2014

SHANE ALAN RICKMAN, Petitioner v. FREDDY BUTLER, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, Respondents


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On May 13, 2014, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation was entered and the parties were allowed therein fourteen (14) days in which to file objections to the recommendations made by the magistrate judge. On or about May 22, 2014, petitioner filed unsigned objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. (Doc. 17). By order entered May 27, 2014, petitioner was ordered to return a signed copy of his objections to the court within fourteen (14) days from the date of entry of the order. He was advised that failure to comply with the order would result in the objections being stricken without further notice. (Doc. 18). To date, petitioner has not returned a signed copy of his objections.

After careful consideration of the record in this case and the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court hereby ADOPTS the report of the magistrate judge. The court further ACCEPTS the recommendations of the magistrate judge that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied.

A separate order in conformity with this Memorandum Opinion will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

__________

SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rickman v. Butler

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION
Jul 20, 2014
Case No. 6:13-cv-00088-SLB-HGD (N.D. Ala. Jul. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Rickman v. Butler

Case Details

Full title:SHANE ALAN RICKMAN, Petitioner v. FREDDY BUTLER, Warden, and THE ATTORNEY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA JASPER DIVISION

Date published: Jul 20, 2014

Citations

Case No. 6:13-cv-00088-SLB-HGD (N.D. Ala. Jul. 20, 2014)

Citing Cases

Smiley v. Givens

the running of the AEDPA's one-year limitation period in § 2244(d)(1)(A). See Brown v. Hooks, 176 Fed.Appx.…

McMeans v. Alabama

If Respondents' argument is accepted, McMeans's judgment of conviction became final on May 14, 2014, when the…