From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richter v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

January 21, 1997.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered December 15, 1995, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Before: Wallach, J. P., Nardelli, Tom, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.


The trial court's findings, that defendant had advised plaintiff when purchasing his consigned art work for herself and had obtained his consent before doing so, rested in large measure on the credibility of the witnesses and was a fair interpretation of the evidence ( see, Thoreson v Penthouse Intl., 80 NY2d 490, 495). In view of the foregoing, it is unnecessary to reach the other arguments raised by defendants.


Summaries of

Richter v. Stein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 21, 1997
235 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Richter v. Stein

Case Details

Full title:HORACE RICHTER, Appellant, v. GERTRUDE STEIN, Doing Business as GALLERY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1997

Citations

235 A.D.2d 295 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
652 N.Y.S.2d 708