From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richter v. Municipal Court

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jun 10, 1970
8 Cal.App.3d 616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970)

Opinion

Docket No. 12412.

June 10, 1970.

Appeal from Superior Court of Sacramento County, Evin F. Scheehy, Judge.

COUNSEL

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General, and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorney General, for Real Party in Interest and Appellant.

Bradford Stanley and Jerome Stanley for Plaintiff and Respondent.

No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.


MEMORANDUM CASE


OPINION


This is a companion case to Childress v. Municipal Court, ante, page 611 [ 87 Cal.Rptr. 383].

The facts and procedural background are essentially the same and repetition is not necessary.

The People also bring this appeal from the order of the superior court finding the seized films not obscene, and restraining the district attorney and municipal court from prosecuting the respondent for a violation of section 311.2 of the Penal Code. The People raise the same two arguments on appeal as they did in Childress.

Our decision herein is necessarily controlled by our holding in Childress, supra, ante, page 611.

Accordingly, the order granting the writ of prohibition is reversed, and the case is remanded to the municipal court.

Pierce, P.J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied July 8, 1970, and the petition of the plaintiff and respondent for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied August 5, 1970.


Summaries of

Richter v. Municipal Court

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Jun 10, 1970
8 Cal.App.3d 616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970)
Case details for

Richter v. Municipal Court

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT RICHTER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Jun 10, 1970

Citations

8 Cal.App.3d 616 (Cal. Ct. App. 1970)
87 Cal. Rptr. 386