From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richt v. Strohrmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 1998
247 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

February 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.).


Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The infant plaintiff was a passenger in an automobile driven by the defendant Paul A. Strohrmann, which collided with an automobile driven by the defendant Paul Oliva at the intersection of Strong and Catskill Avenues in Suffolk County. The jury returned a verdict finding Strohrmann 100% at fault for the happening of the accident, and the court dismissed the complaint against Oliva.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the jury verdict finding Oliva free from negligence was not against the weight of the evidence. It is well settled that "a jury verdict in favor of a defendant should not be set aside unless `the jury could not have reached the verdict on any fair interpretation of the evidence'" ( Nicastro v. Park, 113 A.D.2d 129, 134, quoting Delgado v. Board of Educ., 65 A.D.2d 547, affd 48 N.Y.2d 643). Here, the jury could have reasonably found from the evidence, which included the testimony of a neutral nonparty witness, that Oliva lawfully proceeded into the intersection while it was still clear, and had begun to turn south when he was struck by Strohrmann's vehicle, which was traveling north at a very fast speed in excess of the posted limit. Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence ( cf., Bolta v. Lohan, 242 A.D.2d 356; Nunziata v. Birchell, 238 A.D.2d 555; Dellavecchia v. Zorros, 231 A.D.2d 549; Mohamed v. Frische, 223 A.D.2d 628).

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Joy, J.P., Krausman, Goldstein and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richt v. Strohrmann

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 9, 1998
247 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Richt v. Strohrmann

Case Details

Full title:DANIELLE RICHT et al., Appellants, v. PAUL A. STROHRMANN, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 9, 1998

Citations

247 A.D.2d 458 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
667 N.Y.S.2d 949

Citing Cases

Schlecter v. Abbondadello

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs. Contrary to the…

Caserta v. Levittown School District

The plaintiffs contended that the jury's verdict was against the weight of the evidence. "[A] jury verdict in…