From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richson v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01456-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01456-AWI-SKO PC

11-09-2012

SEAN RICHSON, Plaintiff, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Defendant.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT

PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

FEE IN FULL OR FILE APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


(Doc. 3)

Plaintiff Sean Richson, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on September 7, 2012. On September 11, 2012, the Court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to either pay the $350.00 filing fee in full or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within forty-five days. More than forty-five days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. Plaintiff was warned that dismissal would occur if he failed to obey the order.

A civil action may not proceed absent the submission of either the filing fee or a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff has submitted neither in compliance with the Court's order to do so, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 110.

Accordingly, the Court HEREBY ORDERS this action dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Richson v. Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 9, 2012
CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01456-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Richson v. Diaz

Case Details

Full title:SEAN RICHSON, Plaintiff, v. RALPH M. DIAZ, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 1:12-cv-01456-AWI-SKO PC (E.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2012)