From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richmond v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 4, 1967
432 P.2d 666 (Okla. Crim. App. 1967)

Opinion

No. A-14339.

October 4, 1967.

Original proceeding in which LeRoy Richmond seeks a writ of habeas corpus alleging that he was denied a speedy trial. Writ denied.

LeRoy Richmond, pro se.

G.T. Blankenship, Atty. Gen., Hugh H. Collum, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.


This is an original proceeding in which LeRoy Richmond, petitioner herein, seeks a writ of habeas corpus from this Court, alleging that he was denied his right to a speedy trial, in the District Court of Oklahoma County.

By his own statement in his petition, he admits that he was on bond, and not incarcerated pending the trial. Therefore, the rule would apply, which we have repeated many times, as in Payne v. State, Okla. Cr. 388 P.2d 331 (1964):

"Defendant who is at liberty on bail must demand trial or resist continuance of prosecution from term to term in order to entitle him to claim successfully that he was denied speedy trial."

See, Article 2, § 20, Oklahoma Constitution.

The writ is accordingly denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richmond v. Page

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Oct 4, 1967
432 P.2d 666 (Okla. Crim. App. 1967)
Case details for

Richmond v. Page

Case Details

Full title:LeROY RICHMOND, PETITIONER, v. RAY H. PAGE, WARDEN, OKLAHOMA STATE…

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Oct 4, 1967

Citations

432 P.2d 666 (Okla. Crim. App. 1967)
1967 OK CR 169

Citing Cases

State v. Blevins

In the case of Cooper v. California, 386 U.S. 58, 17 L. Ed. 2d 730, the court held a search of a vehicle…

Constabile v. State

This Court has long stated the general rule that a defendant on bail must demand a trial or resist the…