From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richmond v. BMC Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 19, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Oswego County, Nicholson, J.

Present — Green, J.P., Pine, Fallon, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the cross motions of defendants and third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The record establishes that plaintiff was a special employee of defendant Buckbee-Mears as a matter of law ( see, Thompson v. Grumman Aerospace Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 553, 557-558; Jeffords v. Professional Bldrs./Remodelers Group, 186 A.D.2d 989; Lesanti v. Harmac Indus., 175 A.D.2d 664) and the acceptance by plaintiff of workers' compensation benefits as an employee of his general employer precludes him from bringing this Labor Law action against defendants ( see, Degruchy v. Xerox Corp., 188 A.D.2d 1003).


Summaries of

Richmond v. BMC Industries, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Richmond v. BMC Industries, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN RICHMOND, Appellant, v. BMC INDUSTRIES, INC., et al., Respondents and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
641 N.Y.S.2d 773

Citing Cases

Davis v. Butler

We reject the contention of plaintiff that the employee handbook provided to him by Livingston raises a…

Argueta v. Fleming

At his deposition, plaintiff testified that he applied for and received worker's compensation benefits as a…