From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richichi v. Grillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 1973
42 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

August 13, 1973


In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by respondent on August 31, 1966, defendants appeal from an order of the Nassau County Supreme Court, entered March 26, 1973, which granted plaintiff's motion to remove the action from the Military Suspense Calendar, and restore it to the Ready Day Calendar. Two prior motions for similar relief had been denied in 1971. In our opinion, the order sought to be reviewed is not appealable as of right. However, to reach the merits of the appeal, leave to appeal is granted nunc pro tunc. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by deleting therefrom the words "11th day of June, 1973" in the final decretal paragraph, and substituting therefor the words "the 8th day of October, 1973". As so modified, order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. On the merits, we find that there was no abuse of discretion by Special Term in vacating the stay of the trial because the one defendant with personal knowledge of the facts surrounding the accident was serving in the United States Navy, and stationed in Naples, Italy. There was no showing that he could not secure leave to attend the trial or adduce his proof by deposition ( Boone v. Lightner, 319 U.S. 561; Tabor v. Miller, 389 F.2d 645). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Munder, Latham, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richichi v. Grillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 13, 1973
42 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

Richichi v. Grillo

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE RICHICHI, Respondent, v. KENNETH GRILLO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 13, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 875 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

Warshawsky v. Warshawsky

The defendant's present commanding officer has indicated that the defendant will be available to attend the…

Carrasquillo v. City of New York

Nor did counsel make any showing that the appellant could not secure leave to attend a trial or present his…