From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richfield Prop., v. Galaxy Knitting Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued January 7, 2000

February 24, 2000

In an action for a judgment declaring that the defendants are required to indemnify the plaintiffs Richfield Properties, Ltd., and Stuart Goldstein, individually and as partners doing business as Consol Building Associates, for any damages awarded in an underlying negligence action entitled Montenegro v. Richfield Properties, which was pending in Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 45683/93, the plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated November 9, 1998, as (a) granted the cross motion of CNA Insurance Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and declared that the policy issued by it to the defendant Galaxy Knitting Mills, Inc., did not afford coverage to the plaintiffs Richfield Properties, Ltd., and Stuart Goldstein, individually and as partners doing business as Consol Building Associates, and (b) granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Galaxy Knitting Mills, Inc., which was for an order declaring that the sole remedy available to the plaintiffs Richfield Properties, Ltd., and Stuart Goldstein, individually and as partners doing business as Consol Building Associates, was recovery of the insurance premiums paid to the plaintiff National Union Fire Insurance Company.

Jacobowitz, Garfinkel Lesman (Fiedelman McGaw, Jericho, N Y [Andrew Zajac] of counsel), for appellants.

Tromello, Jennings Siegel, New York, N.Y. (Josephine A. Lupo of counsel), for respondent Galaxy Knitting Mills, Inc.

Lustig Brown, LLP, New York, N.Y. (James Duggan and Sherri Robinson of counsel), for respondent CNA Insurance Company.

THOMAS R. SULLIVAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, WILLIAM D. FRIEDMANN and ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.

The plaintiffs failed to rebut the evidence of the defendant CNA Insurance Company (hereinafter CNA) that the plaintiffs Richfield Properties, Ltd., and Stuart Goldstein, individually and as partners doing business as Consol Building Associates (hereinafter Consol), were not added to the liability insurance policy it issued to the defendant Galaxy Knitting Mills, Inc. (hereinafter Galaxy), and the court therefore properly granted summary judgment to CNA dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it (see, American Ref-Fuel Co. of Hempstead v. Resource Recycling, 248 A.D.2d 420 ; Morrison-Knudsen Co. v. Continental Cas. Co., 181 A.D.2d 500 ).

After finding that Galaxy had breached its lease by failing to procure liability insurance for the benefit of Consol, the court properly limited Consol's damages to the costs of obtaining its own liability policy since such a policy was in effect at the time of the accident from which the underlying tort claim arises (see,Mavashev v. Shalosh Realty, 233 A.D.2d 301 ; Wallen v. Polo Grounds Bar Grill N.Y., 198 A.D.2d 19 ).


Summaries of

Richfield Prop., v. Galaxy Knitting Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 24, 2000
269 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Richfield Prop., v. Galaxy Knitting Mills

Case Details

Full title:RICHFIELD PROPERTIES, LTD., et al., etc., appellants, v. GALAXY KNITTING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

269 A.D.2d 516 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
704 N.Y.S.2d 505

Citing Cases

Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.

These damages potentially include out-of-pocket expenses, including deductibles paid under the OneBeacon…

Madison Cnty. v. Evanston Ins. Co.

These damages potentially include out-of-pocket expenses, including deductibles paid under the OneBeacon…