From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riches v. Rowland

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
May 23, 2008
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-114-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. May. 23, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-114-MP-AK.

May 23, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 1, Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Jonathan Lee Riches. While Petitioner designated this as a habeas corpus petition, it is not on the proper form, and he has not sought leave to proceed in forma pauperis or paid the filing fee. In any event, Petitioner does not appear to seek habeas corpus relief; instead, he seeks the return of money which belongs to him and claims a vague Eighth Amendment violation, an improper denial of contact with his family, and the recording of his phone calls without consent. These charges appear then to be more in the nature of claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and Petitioner should amend his complaint on a § 1983 form and complete an application to proceed IFP, forms which will be provided to him by the Clerk. In amending his complaint, Petitioner should be clear and specific in making his allegations, as those presently before the Court are not sufficient for stating a claim for relief because of their vagueness.

To amend his complaint, Petitioner must completely fill out the new civil rights complaint form, marking it "Amended Complaint." Petitioner is advised that the amended complaint must contain all of Petitioner's allegations and should not in any way refer to the original complaint. An amended complaint completely replaces all previous complaints and all earlier complaints are disregarded. N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 15.1. Petitioner should file the amended complaint in the Court and keep one identical copy for himself. Petitioner need not file service copies until instructed to do so by the Court.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED:

1. The clerk of court shall forward to Petitioner a Section 1983 form and the appropriate IFP form.

2. Petitioner must file the amended complaint and the motion for IFP no later than June 24, 2008.

3. Failure of Petitioner to respond to this order or submit the requested information or explain his inability to do so will result in a recommendation to the District Judge that this action be dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Riches v. Rowland

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
May 23, 2008
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-114-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. May. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Riches v. Rowland

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Petitioner, v. PLEASANT ROWLAND, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: May 23, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-114-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. May. 23, 2008)