Opinion
No. 2:07-cv-2654 LKK JFM (PC).
October 6, 2008
ORDER
On October 1, 2008, plaintiff filed a document styled as a motion for reconsideration and a motion for recusal of the "presiding judge." This civil rights action was closed on April 7, 2008. The fanciful allegations of plaintiff's October 1, 2008 motion support neither consideration of the motion for reconsideration as a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) nor recusal of the judges assigned to this action. Plaintiff is advised that no orders will issue in response to future filings.