From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riches v. Life Style Weekly

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 29, 2010
3:10-cv-00190-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 29, 2010)

Opinion

3:10-cv-00190-LRH-VPC.

October 29, 2010


ORDER


On April 2, 2010, plaintiff Jonathan Lee Riches attempted to initiate a civil action in this court; however, he failed to submit a complaint and also failed to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee. On May 4, 2010, the court dismissed this action without prejudice (docket #3) and directed plaintiff, if plaintiff chooses, to file a new action and include a complaint and either an application to proceed in forma pauperis or the filing fee. Judgment was entered on May 6, 2010 (docket #4). Before the court is plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (docket #6). Plaintiff's motion is untimely and raises matters unrelated to those raised in docket #1-1, in which he attempted to initiate a civil action. If plaintiff's allegations are based in fact, such allegations should be brought to the attention of the local district court. For good cause appearing, plaintiff's motion is denied.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (docket #6) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion by movants to intervene as plaintiffs (docket #7) is DENIED.

Dated this 28th day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Riches v. Life Style Weekly

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 29, 2010
3:10-cv-00190-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Riches v. Life Style Weekly

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN LEE RICHES, UMAR FAROUK ABDULMUTALLAB, Plaintiffs, v. LIFE STYLE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 29, 2010

Citations

3:10-cv-00190-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Oct. 29, 2010)