From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riches v. Coleman

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Sep 23, 2008
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00115-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Sep. 23, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00115-MP-AK.

September 23, 2008


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Doc. 5, Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which recommends that this petition be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to obey an order of the Court. The Magistrate Judge filed the Report and Recommendation on Tuesday, August 19, 2008. Petitioner has been furnished a copy of the Report and Recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections. Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo review of those portions to which an objection has made. In this instance, however, no objections were filed.

On May 23, 2008, Petitioner was ordered to file an amended petition and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Doc. 3. Defendant failed to comply with that order. The Magistrate Judge then ordered Petitioner to show cause why this petition should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and to obey an order of the Court. Defendant has not responded, and the time to do so has passed. Having considered the Report and Recommendation, the Court has determined that it should be adopted. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED:

1. The Magistrate's Report and Recommendation at Doc. 5 is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The petition at Doc. 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice.
DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Riches v. Coleman

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division
Sep 23, 2008
CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00115-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Sep. 23, 2008)
Case details for

Riches v. Coleman

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN LEE RICHES, Petitioner, v. USP COLEMAN, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Gainesville Division

Date published: Sep 23, 2008

Citations

CASE NO. 1:08-cv-00115-MP-AK (N.D. Fla. Sep. 23, 2008)

Citing Cases

Pollard v. Vinton

" The court cites as settling the law in this way in England the cases of Grant v. Norway, 10 C.B. 665,…

Missouri Pacific Railway v. McFadden

" Hutchinson on Carriers, 82. This doctrine is sanctioned by a unanimons course of English and American…