From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riche v. Louis

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50673 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

2003-1450 KC.

Decided June 23, 2004.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Civil Court, Kings County (A. Schack, J.), entered July 15, 2003, which denied her motion to vacate the judgment.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: ARONIN, J.P., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ.


Plaintiff commenced the instant action and, after defendant defaulted, an inquest was held to determine the amount of plaintiff's damages. Defendant appeared at said hearing, began to testify regarding the issue of liability and proffered no evidence regarding damages. After a judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, defendant moved to vacate same arguing that the court did not allow her to testify as to her lack of liability. Although a defaulting defendant must be given an opportunity during an inquest to testify, cross-examine witnesses and offer evidence regarding damages ( see Reynolds Securities v. Underwriters Bank Trust Co., 44 NY2d 568), it is well settled that a defaulting defendant concedes liability ( see Amusement Business Underwriters v. American Intl. Group, 66 NY2d 878; McClelland v. Climax Hosiery Mills, 252 NY 347). Accordingly, the lower court did not err in refusing to permit such testimony and defendant's motion to vacate the judgment was properly denied.


Summaries of

Riche v. Louis

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 23, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50673 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Riche v. Louis

Case Details

Full title:MIRMONDE RICHE, Respondent, v. MARIE ST. LOUIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 23, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50673 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)