Richardson v. Wodajo

Full title: SAMOTTA RICHARDSON APPELLANT v. MARKOS S. WODAJO APPELLEE

Court: COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Oct 23, 2014

NO. 02-13-00325-CV (Tex. App. Oct. 23, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00325-CV

10-23-2014

SAMOTTA RICHARDSON APPELLANT v. MARKOS S. WODAJO APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
TRIAL COURT NO. 067-259343-12
MEMORANDUM OPINION¹ AND JUDGMENT

1

On September 19, 2014, we denied appellant's "Response To Late Brief Notice," which we liberally construed as a motion for extension of time based on repeated requests from appellant that this court has already denied. We stated that if appellant's brief is not filed in this court by Monday, September 29, 2014, this appeal may be dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ. DELIVERED: October 23, 2014

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.