From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Ultimate Warranty Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 5, 2010
Case No. 08CV1077 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 08CV1077.

March 5, 2010


ORDER


This matter arises on the Plaintiff/Receiver's Motion by Receiver for Approval of Claims Procedure. (Doc. 42.) The Receiver's motion, and the memorandum in support thereof, asks the Court to approve the claims procedure described in Exhibit A to the motion. ( Id.) This motion is unopposed, and the time for filing a response has expired.

Upon full consideration of the motion, the claims procedure described in Exhibit A, and the forms attached to Exhibit A as Exhibits 1 and 2, the Court finds that the claims procedure proposed by the Receiver is fair and equitable. Accordingly, for the reasons explained in the memorandum in support of the motion, the Court APPROVES the claims procedure as proposed and GRANTS the Motion by Receiver for Approval of Claims Procedure (Doc. 42).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Ultimate Warranty Corp.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Mar 5, 2010
Case No. 08CV1077 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Richardson v. Ultimate Warranty Corp.

Case Details

Full title:SCOTT H. RICHARDSON, DIRECTOR OF SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE AS…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Mar 5, 2010

Citations

Case No. 08CV1077 (N.D. Ohio Mar. 5, 2010)