From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Tesisa

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Mar 20, 2024
Civil Action 2:23-CV-02160 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:23-CV-02160

03-20-2024

JEFFREY RICHARDSON; JACKIE RICHARDSON; ASHLEY SMITH; AND JENNIFER THOMAS, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE PARENT AND BEST FRIEND OF MINORS JT AND JT PLAINTIFFS v. SAMUEL TEFERA TESISA; LINAT LOGISTICS, LLC; BALDEV SINGH; AND TOOR FREIGHTLINES, INC. DEFENDANTS

Timothy D. Crawley ANDERSON CRAWLEY & BURKE, PLLC Attorney for Defendants, Samuel Tefera Tesisa and Linat Logistics, LLC Quinton Thompson MORGAN & MORGAN - MEMPHIS, LLC Attorney for Plaintiffs


Timothy D. Crawley ANDERSON CRAWLEY & BURKE, PLLC Attorney for Defendants, Samuel Tefera Tesisa and Linat Logistics, LLC

Quinton Thompson MORGAN & MORGAN - MEMPHIS, LLC Attorney for Plaintiffs

CONSENT ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

TU M. PHAM UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on the Joint Motion ore tenus of the parties, Plaintiffs and Defendants, Samuel Tefera Tesisa and Linat Logistics, LLC, only, for the entry of an Order dismissing the said Defendants, only, from the above-styled and numbered cause, all claims asserted therein against them, all Complaints and amendments thereto, all pending Motions and all claims that could have been but were not asserted by the said parties in said action, with prejudice. Counsel for Plaintiffs, by virtue of signature below, has verified Plaintiffs' compliance with TCA §71-5-117(g) and confirms that there are no known TennCare subrogation claims of the State of Tennessee or any entity acting pursuant to TCA §71-5-117(f) that remain unaddressed in this action, i.e. TennCare liens. Counsel for the Plaintiffs, by virtue of signature below, verifies there are no hospital liens of record which remain unsatisfied or that arrangement has been made with the hospital to satisfy its lien from the proceeds of the settlement, and the Court, after having considered the Motion of the parties, being fully advised in the premises, finds that said Motion is well taken and should be granted. It is, therefore,

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that all pending Motions as between these parties only, if any, be and the same are hereby withdrawn; that the Complaint filed herein by the Plaintiffs against these said Defendants, only, all amendments thereto, all other matters and proceedings of any nature pending between these parties, and all claims and causes of action that could have been but were not asserted herein as against these Defendants be, and the same are hereby, fully, finally and forever dismissed with prejudice.

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that each party shall bear its own discretionary costs, fees and expenses. The Clerk's Bill of Costs in this cause will be addressed at such time as the remaining claims herein against the non-dismissed Defendants are concluded.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED


Summaries of

Richardson v. Tesisa

United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division
Mar 20, 2024
Civil Action 2:23-CV-02160 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2024)
Case details for

Richardson v. Tesisa

Case Details

Full title:JEFFREY RICHARDSON; JACKIE RICHARDSON; ASHLEY SMITH; AND JENNIFER THOMAS…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division

Date published: Mar 20, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 2:23-CV-02160 (W.D. Tenn. Mar. 20, 2024)