Opinion
1:19CV352
02-23-2022
OLANDER RAYMOND RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. SGT. TAYLOR and OFFICER HOPKINS, Defendants.
ORDER
N. Carlton Tilley, Jr. Senior United States District Judge
On January 6, 2022, the United States Magistrate Judge's Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice was served pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by the statute, although Mr. Richardson filed a document entitled “Motion of Acceptance and or Arbitration to Courts Dismissal of Defendatns [sic] Summary Judgement Complaint” in which he requests that the Court grant judgment in his favor. [Doc. #42.]
In the absence of objections, the Court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. #40] is hereby adopted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #34] is DENIED and Plaintiff's pro se motion [Doc. #42] is deemed moot in light of the Court's ruling.