Summary
denying in part, dismissing in part mandamus petition
Summary of this case from Richardson v. TuckerOpinion
Case No. SC11-657.
June 7, 2011.
Lower Tribunal No(s). 38-2005-CF-00252.
The petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent the petitioner seeks to compel action by the State Attorney's Office for the Eighth Judicial Circuit, the petition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). To the extent the petitioner seeks other relief, the petition is hereby dismissed as facially insufficient.
PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.