From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 7, 2011
64 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 2011)

Summary

denying in part, dismissing in part mandamus petition

Summary of this case from Richardson v. Tucker

Opinion

Case No. SC11-657.

June 7, 2011.

Lower Tribunal No(s). 38-2005-CF-00252.


The petitioner has filed a petition for writ of mandamus. To the extent the petitioner seeks to compel action by the State Attorney's Office for the Eighth Judicial Circuit, the petition is hereby denied because petitioner has failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested. See Huffman v. State, 813 So. 2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000). To the extent the petitioner seeks other relief, the petition is hereby dismissed as facially insufficient.

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 7, 2011
64 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 2011)

denying in part, dismissing in part mandamus petition

Summary of this case from Richardson v. Tucker
Case details for

Richardson v. State

Case Details

Full title:SHERNERD L. RICHARDSON, Petitioner(s) v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent(s)

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 7, 2011

Citations

64 So. 3d 1261 (Fla. 2011)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. Tucker

Richardson has compiled a history of pro se filings that, like the instant petition, were either devoid of…