From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 10, 2022
338 So. 3d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D21-2687

05-10-2022

Dominick Ricardo RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, and Danielle Rufai, Assistant Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and George D.E. Burden, and Danielle Rufai, Assistant Public Defenders, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Whitney Brown Hartless, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LAMBERT, C.J., HARRIS and TRAVER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 10, 2022
338 So. 3d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Richardson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Dominick Ricardo RICHARDSON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: May 10, 2022

Citations

338 So. 3d 902 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)