From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 24, 2021
328 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2496

11-24-2021

James Lee RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

James Lee Richardson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


James Lee Richardson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The amended petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Lewis, B.L. Thomas, and Bilbrey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 24, 2021
328 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Richardson v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Lee RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 24, 2021

Citations

328 So. 3d 397 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)