From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 6, 2024
4:24-cv-30-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-cv-30-DPM

11-06-2024

EVERY RICHARDSON ADC #139311 PLAINTIFF v. LORENETTA SMITH, Lieutenant, Varner/Varner Super Max; SEDRICK FRANKLIN, Disciplinary Serving Sergeant, Varner/Varner Super Max; and JANICE BLAKE, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Arkansas Department of Corrections DEFENDANTS


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge.

The Court adopts Magistrate Judge Ervin's unopposed recommendation, Doc. 29. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). Richardson had difficulty responding to the motion for summary judgment because he lacked access to the law library and his paperwork. Doc. 30. So the Court granted his request for more time to respond with objections. Doc. 31. He did not do so. The defendants' motion for summary judgment, Doc. 25, is granted. Richardson's claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Nov 6, 2024
4:24-cv-30-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2024)
Case details for

Richardson v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:EVERY RICHARDSON ADC #139311 PLAINTIFF v. LORENETTA SMITH, Lieutenant…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 6, 2024

Citations

4:24-cv-30-DPM (E.D. Ark. Nov. 6, 2024)