From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Sisk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 19, 2008
300 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

Nos. 08-6050, 08-6769.

Submitted: November 13, 2008.

Decided: November 19, 2008.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00488-REP).

Gregory A. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Gregory A. Richardson appeals the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his complaint filed in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) for failure to pay his filing fee, and the order denying his motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the orders and record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Richardson v. Sisk, No. 3:07-cv00488-REP (E.D. Va. Oct. 26, 2007; Apr. 28, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Sisk

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 19, 2008
300 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Richardson v. Sisk

Case Details

Full title:Gregory A. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James SISK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 2008

Citations

300 F. App'x 216 (4th Cir. 2008)