From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 13, 2018
Case No. LA CV 17-07406-VBF-PLA (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 17-07406-VBF-PLA

09-13-2018

GREGORY RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. STUART SHERMAN (Warden), Respondent.


ORDER

Adopting Report & Recommendation; Dismissing the First Amended Petition with Prejudice as Untimely; Directing the Entry of Separate Judgment; Terminating & Closing the Action (JS-6)

The Court has reviewed the amended habeas petition, respondent's motion to dismiss, petitioner's opposition, and the R&R. Petitioner did not object to the R&R, and the Court finds no error of law, fact, or logic therein. Thus, the R&R [Doc #27] is ADOPTED.

Respondent's motion to dismiss [Doc #19] is GRANTED.

The Amended Petition [Doc #9] is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

This action is DISMISSED with prejudice, and the case is TERMINATED (JS-6).

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 13, 2018

/s/_________

Hon. Valerie Baker Fairbank

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Richardson v. Sherman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
Sep 13, 2018
Case No. LA CV 17-07406-VBF-PLA (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2018)
Case details for

Richardson v. Sherman

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. STUART SHERMAN (Warden), Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 13, 2018

Citations

Case No. LA CV 17-07406-VBF-PLA (C.D. Cal. Sep. 13, 2018)