From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2007
No. 2:04-cv-00393-DFL-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2007)

Opinion

No. 2:04-cv-00393-DFL-GGH P.

August 24, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 22, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 22, 2007, are adopted in full; and
2. Defendants' March 1, 2006 motion for summary judgment is granted.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Runnels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 24, 2007
No. 2:04-cv-00393-DFL-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2007)
Case details for

Richardson v. Runnels

Case Details

Full title:DEWAYNE McGEE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. R.L. RUNNELS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 24, 2007

Citations

No. 2:04-cv-00393-DFL-GGH P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 24, 2007)