From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Quarles

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 1, 2014
580 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-6461

08-01-2014

ERIC M. RICHARDSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WILLIAM D. QUARLES, Respondent - Appellee.

Eric Richardson, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge. (1:13-cv-01154-GLR) Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric M. Richardson appeals the district court's orders denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant Richardson leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Quarles, No. 1:13-cv-01154-GLR (D. Md. filed Feb. 28, 2014 & entered Mar. 4, 2014; filed Mar. 25, 2014 & entered Mar. 26, 2014). We deny Richardson's petition to this court for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Richardson v. Quarles

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 1, 2014
580 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Richardson v. Quarles

Case Details

Full title:ERIC M. RICHARDSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. WILLIAM D. QUARLES…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 1, 2014

Citations

580 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2014)