From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Muscato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

October 4, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.

Present — Doerr, J.P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: "A golfer has a duty to give a timely warning to other persons within the foreseeable ambit of danger" (Jenks v McGranaghan, 30 N.Y.2d 475, 479; see also, Rinaldo v McGovern, 167 A.D.2d 942), but "there is generally no duty to warn persons not in the intended line of flight on another tee or fairway of an intention to strike the ball" (Noe v Park Country Club, 115 A.D.2d 230). Plaintiff Lawrence E. Richardson, who was in the vicinity of the 13th tee and about 20 to 25 feet from the 12th green, was struck on the head by a ball hit by defendant. Defendant was taking his second shot from the left side of the fairway, using a nine iron, aiming for the right side of the 12th green, but his shot pulled to the left. Defendant admitted that, before he took his shot, he observed people between the 12th green and the 13th tee and further acknowledged that there was only about 40 feet between the 12th green and the 13th tee. He also admitted that plaintiff and his party were only 20 to 25 feet off the 12th green when defendant took his shot. Under these circumstances, we conclude that whether plaintiff was in the foreseeable ambit of danger cannot be determined as a matter of law but, rather, presents a question of fact for determination by a jury.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Muscato

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 4, 1991
176 A.D.2d 1227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Richardson v. Muscato

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE E. RICHARDSON et al., Respondents, v. BERNARD C. MUSCATO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 4, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 1227 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
576 N.Y.S.2d 721

Citing Cases

Anand v. Kapoor

We affirm. We acknowledge that there is authority which holds that "[a] golfer has a duty to give a timely…